Jonas J�rgensen wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> and the 0.9.9 isn't as good as the nightly/latest at Mrch 1st was >> (also it is said thgat 0.9.9 was build from this or did i get >> something wrong?) > > > Your User-Agent header is: > Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.9+) Gecko/20020314 > > Where did you see the "0.9.8+"? > > /Jonas >
the installer wrote something like 0.9.8 xyzabc... and the uninstaller and the installer of the flash 6 plugin(u much better installer than the netscape-compatible one for flash 5) for example did. it was this way this the milestone 0.9.9 on my machine but webservers saw something more right i fear... at least the newsservers did... however todays nightly build hasn't this "bug" anymore! (mmh but date is 20020315 on it - seems like to much work for to little people... this AOL thing seems to change em to some hectic one... i hope that will not make the 1.0 to be something worse that it could be...) but the rendering isue is still the same... i mean that point bout http://www.chip.de all i can say that nightly build of march 1st did not have this and non of the milestones since at least... em i think 0.9.2 was the first i had. as i sad it must be something bout javascript but i dont know exactly what... (stupid one i am!) o.k. i will setup my email adress properly nexttime! (really!)
