I have seen this bug too. Just thought I would chime in and let people 
know that they arent the only ones.

The place I have seen this is:
ibm a20p laptop
ati graphics card
win98se
0.9.8

I get the contents of the email program becomes invisible. If I resize 
or move the window it reappears. By alt-tabbing I can get it invisible 
again. Random occurence.

I am now on win2k with a dell 8100 inspirion with 0.9.9 and I havent 
seen it yet.

bob

dman84 wrote:
> Peter Lakanen wrote:
> 
>>
>> Running 0.9.9 release (not a nightly) on Win2k, 1 ghz chip, 512 RAM.
>>
>> #1 Since 0.9.8, I've noticed lots of screen redraw problems.  Figured
>> they'd be fixed in 0.9.9 but they are still here.  Like right now, part
>> of the message window I'm typing in did not redraw after clicking drop
>> down list to set me as CC on this message.  Anyone know whats up with
>> this problem?
> 
> 
> have you dynamically switched themes? this would happen.. if you do not 
> restart mozilla.. there are a couple of bugs that exist here.. another 
> is if you did not use a new profile.. this would cause the same issues.
> 
>>
>> #2 The Single Most Annoying Bug In The Damn Universe: With 0.9.9 came
>> the now extremely frustrating bug of Mozilla hanging for as much as
>> SEVEN seconds whenever I close a Mozilla window.  What the heck is going
>> on here?  Is it some kind of debug thing or what?  Interestingly enough,
>> if I start a new window but do NOT load a web page in it (I default to
>> blank windows), it closes instantly with no hang.  But if I load ANY web
>> page in it and then close the window, Mozilla is hung for 4-7 seconds
>> (yes, I've timed it with a stopwatch).
> 
> 
> 
> I see this, I filed bug 131130 the other day.. its doing some writing to 
> disk.  THere is also a memory bug here I found that does affect window 
> close.
> 
>>
>> #3 Just noticed this one... when started this new message, it did not
>> fill in the newsgroup I was posting to as a default.  Worked fine in
>> 0.9.8.  Anyone know about this?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -peter
>>
> 
> Its probably related to #1.
> 
> -Dennis
> 
> 


Reply via email to