Hi! Pratik wrote: > Its part of the MachV spec so I gues it should be in. But I can't > believe they used the tree widget for the Download Manager. Why didn't > they use outliner? There's a bug for converting all tree widgets to > outliner and they go ahead and write up new code that uses the tree > widget? I'm surprised.
In this case, I think it's ok. The download list is probably always pretty small, so performance isn't much of a problem. I think the problem with outliner is that you can't put arbritary content in it, so stuff like a progress bar might be a problem. I could be wrong, though. Christian
