No, I think he's saying he can't do stuff like
<script>
var pi = java.lang.Math.pi; // or whatever. it's been a while.
</script>
There is no ``applet'' or ``plugin instance'' in this case. Somebody
just wants to access vanilla Java stuff from script.
chris
Michael Kaply wrote:
>
> Are you saying that you cannot do LiveConnect with <OBJECT>s?
>
> Mike Kaply
> IBM
>
> xiaobin lu wrote:
>
> > Currently the mozilla frame layout manager scan all the html tag and
> > generate the appropriate frame for each tag. For example, if there is a
> > tag like "applet", "embed" or "object", an nsObjectFrame will be
> > initiated and so on a pluginInstance got set up. However, this does not
> > cover some situations we encountered here. You can find more details in
> > bug 60018.
> > Basically the problem is when there is some java classes are
> > initiated in the javascript function,there is no nsObjectFrame generated
> > and therefore no javapluginInstance will be generated. This is OK most
> > times if we don't want to call some functions in netscape.javascript
> > package like "setMember", "getMember" and "call" etc. In fact the
> > successful call of these functions needs a pluginInstance object,
> > however there is no such objects exist.
> > My thought which could be wrong was to set up a dummy nsObjectFrame
> > somewhere when the java class got initiated (probably in
> > invoke_java_constructor function,
> > mozilla/js/src/liveconnect/jsj_method.c). But anyway I would like to
> > think this is a missing feature of the frame layout manager.
> > Please let me know how do you guys think anout this. Thanks in
> > advance!
> > -----------------------------------------------
> > Xiaobin Lu OJI, Desktop Foundation Software
> > Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone:408-517-6769/x6769
> > _______________________________________________
