In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthias Gutfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Of course some of the functionality can be "reverse-engineered" with > test cases, but I'd much prefer some real documentation. Any chance for > that? Or should we treat Mozilla browsers as a "black box"? If you pick one of the doctypes[1] that activate the Standards mode, you can find documentation about the expected behavior at http://www.w3.org/ [1] http://www.hut.fi/u/hsivonen/doctype.html -- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clinet.fi/~henris/
- Re: Build Minus Quirks? Simon Fraser
- Re: Build Minus Quirks? Christian Mattar
- Re: Build Minus Quirks? Canasta
- Re: Build Minus Quirks? L. David Baron
- Re: Build Minus Quirks? Matthias Gutfeldt
- Re: Build Minus Quirks? Micah Harwell
- Re: Build Minus Quirks? Henri Sivonen
- Re: Build Minus Quirks? L. David Baron
- Re: Build Minus Quirks? Matthias Gutfeldt
- Re: Build Minus Quirks? Matthias Gutfeldt
- Re: Build Minus Quirks? Henri Sivonen
- Re: Build Minus Quirks? L. David Baron
- Re: Build Minus Quirks? Matthias Gutfeldt
- Re: Build Minus Quirks? fantasai
