"Adam Sj�gren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If not, how can you expect any browser to display your page as you
> intended, except by chance?
MSIE 5
MSIE 5.5
MSIE 6
The people at Microsoft know how to program browsers
> > It's better the Mozilla team fixes the bug, or I cancel them from
> > the list of standard compliant browsers.
>
> I don't understand this, you don't think Mozilla is
> standards-compliant if it doesn't render a non standards-compliant
> page as you arbitrarily imagined it?
My pages are well shown by Mozilla as long as I do
not put the "BODY { overflow:auto } into the CSS
It's better for Mozilla to fix the bug as to continue
with the arrogant attidude, You and Canasta are showing here.
A 0.25% minority should better not have arrogant attidudes.
> If you really want the bug fixed, attach a minimal validating
> standards-compliant example that shows the problem (example:
> <http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90861>).
> If you set height and width for body in css, the content is
> displayed.
>
> A CSS guru will hopefully jump in and tell us if this is what the
> standard says should happen or not.
I say, Mozilla should better fix the bug
Or do You want that MSIE gains 99.9% :-)
--
Roland M�sl
http://pege.org Clear targets for a confused civilization
http://BeingFound.com Web Design starts at the search engine
