"DeMoN LaG" <n@a> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > "Roland M�sl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:3c7259b7$0$21676$6e365a64 > @newsreader02.highway.telekom.at, on 19 Feb 2002: > > > If Mozilla is not willing to implement zoom, > > it will remiain a second class browser only > > for "I do not like MS" people > > Your query has been answered in detail already, so I won't answer that. > But honestly, threatening to consider Mozilla a "second class browser" > is kind of pointless. The only web sites that will have issues with > Mozilla not implementing stupid, propriatary extensions that aren't part > of written specs are web sites done by "Second class webmasters", which > you seem to fall into the catagory of.
You want to call new features second class? You are really an arrogant fundamentalist. Did anybody try to understand what I want to do? No, only fundamentalist wail arround, that this is not standard. Maybe I should remember, that Mozilla implemented already some MSIE extensions, because they found out that they are very practicall. So maybe the truth is not "We do it not because it's now in the standard" but "We do it not, because it just right now to complicate" -- Roland M�sl http://pege.org Clear targets for a confused civilization http://BeingFound.com Web Design starts at the search engine
