Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > Terry Friesen wrote: > > That would be true if left and top were set for the positioned element. > > In this example they are not set so they would default to "auto". > > So the positioned table should be placed as though it were static > > positioned,and thus be offset by the parent table. > > Is that correct? > > No. The positioned element is still taken out of flow. So it should not > be positioned as if the position were static. > > That said, there are probably issues with positioning and tables > interacting. :)
Hey,I used the word "placed" not "positioned". I think you knew what I meant. And don't beat yourself up......we all miss one once in a while :-) I think this bug report deals with this issue. http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53663
