yup, true it is! so for mozilla to make it, yes we know its dom compatible, it needs to get that compatibility useful.
i seems to me like maybe for mozilla 2.0 or 1.5, we need to get a Map of all the functions and how they interact as to get the bigger picture of everything and how it works... so making it better can be done faster and well need i say better again ahmed k "dexters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:aac0rq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > i think the the most developers avoid to > write dhtml scipts for mozilla /netscape > because the performance is very spiky and slow. > > things get to evolve on our mozilla > but the dhtml performance is a shame. > > sorry, but this is my opinion ! > > �dex� > (greetings to the copymag man) > > > "James Clash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hm, if you read http://www.mozillazine.org/reviews/articles/review26.html > > or take a look at http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12761 > > you really see that still most things are the same :/ > > But I still have hope ... > > > > -- > > James > > > > > > Kryptolus C.L. wrote: > > > Ahmed K wrote: > > > > > >> Yes please look at it, mozilla is really slow compared to IE whene it > > >> comes > > >> to playing with elements! > > >> > > >> Ahmed k > > >> "James Clash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > >> > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> I just wanted to drop a short line about > > >>> the necessity of a competitive DHTML performance > > >>> in the final release of Mozilla 1.0. > > >>> > > >>> I think enough users have already complaint about > > >>> that so I will save my breath. > > >>> > > >>> Please consider > > >>> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129115 > > >>> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117061 > > >>> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129953 > > >>> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137706 > > >>> > > >>> or whatever is needed to get this thing rocking. > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> James > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > I doubt DHTML improvemence is going to improve much before 1.0. > > > > > > > > >
