On Wednesday 2003-09-24 01:56 +0200, mark kaplun wrote: > How should I interpret the silence on this topic? > 1. wrong NG > 2. bad english > 3. works for you > 4. I'm not in the club > 5. It is much more sexy to manage the tree then to solve core bugs > 6. Whoever wrote the code had left the project and no one understands the > interaction between tree splitters and box scrollbars
I think it's a combination of * (1) n.p.m.xpfe might be a better newsgroup for XUL questions, but I'm not really sure. * (6) * your original message may not have gotten through to those who use the group as a mailing list (did you get a response about the spam filters? -- I don't remember seeing the message.) * the "Subject" of the message is extremely nondescriptive I'm not sure if 'overflow' was really intended to be used with the XUL box model -- many parts of XUL were not designed to interact with many of the more advanced features of CSS layout. Probably the best thing to do is to file a bug with the testcase. Development newsgroups really aren't a good forum for bug reports. -David -- L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ >
