On Friday 2003-10-10 03:01 -0500, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > Other than causing false positives on the layout regression tests, does > the NS_FRAME_HAS_LOADED_IMAGES have a reason for existing? A quick lxr > search gives > (<http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/search?string=NS_FRAME_HAS_LOADED_IMAGES>): > > /layout/base/public/nsIFrame.h, line 172 -- #define > NS_FRAME_HAS_LOADED_IMAGES 0x00000080 > /layout/base/src/nsPresContext.cpp, line 1420 -- > aTargetFrame->AddStateBits(NS_FRAME_HAS_LOADED_IMAGES); > > and no other hits. > > It seems to me like we could remove this flag (and have a free > framestate bit, yay!).
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201076 covers the false positives on the regression test. http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97934 covers another frame state bit that could be removed. I wouldn't be surprised if there are others as well. -David -- L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ > _______________________________________________ Mozilla-layout mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-layout
