On Saturday 2003-11-15 22:48 -0600, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > I think we could certainly make nsFrameManager a plain non-XPCOM class, > though, and just have the prescontext own it...
This seems reasonable to me. On Monday 2003-11-17 08:44 -0500, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > How about we make nsIPresContext be the got-it-all interface that frames > pass around. Pour nsIFrameManager into it. Create nsIPresentation or I'm not sure why you'd want to "pour" nsIFrameManager into it. If you have a bunch of related functions (and data -- the primary frame map and the undisplayed map), why not keep them separate? -David -- L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ > _______________________________________________ mozilla-layout mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-layout
