Background: Dawn and Mitchell asked me not to use the altered
mozilla.org logo for Beonex. Dawn also kindly helped me out with a new
one, so this was no issue. I will stop using the mozilla.org logo for
Beonex.
That makes me think:
What about third-party Mozilla binaries, like the ones provided by
Debian or Redhat? Theoretically, this situation is not different from
mine: A person or organization not associated with mozilla.org and
without approval of mozilla.org creates a binary with the mozilla.org
logo. The binary contains custom changes, which are published as Open
Source, but not included in the binaries or CVS from mozilla.org. IANAL,
but Redhat and Beonex seem to be in the same situation. Only that Beonex
doesn't use the name "Mozilla" and used a slightly altered logo, which
makes this case IMO *less* worse.
Just trying to understand...
