Anyone know?
Well, basically the definition seems to be at NPL/II.:
"Netscape Branded Code means Covered Code that Netscape distributes... under
Netscape trademarks not licensed under the NPL" (paraphrased).
This seems to mean any Netscape distributions and TMs, current and future.
Since it's in Netscape's discretion to decide what they to apply their TM
to, they can just apply their TM to all covered code which makes that
"branded code" is equal "covered code", right?
So why create this new term "branded code"? Talking about "covered code"
would be more straight forward I think.
Given this definition of "branded code", It looks like V.3 gives Netscape a
wildecard, they can do with the entire covered code what ever they want. The
NPL works for Netscape just like a BSD license, right?
So V.1 seems to be an empty clause: It declares Netscape subject to Section
3 provisions, but excepts V.3 which is a wildecard, so there's nothing left.
Section 3 does simply not apply to Netscape.
Did I get this all correct?
I hope not :/
It looks like a leonine clauase, sort of...
