Per Abrahamsen wrote: > MPL is not intended to "protect" derived code in the CopyLeft sense. > It is not a copyleft license. I do not disagree with your explanation in general, but I think that you are using a very limited notion of 'copyleft'. According to http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/copyleft.html "Copyleft is a general concept; there are many ways to fill in the details. [...] An alternate form of copyleft, the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) [...] If you would like to copyleft your program with the GNU GPL or the GNU LGPL, [...]" It seems to me that GPL, LGPL, and MPL all are copylefted licenses, but each have a different scope (executable, library, and file, respectively).
- Delphi Components (SynEdit) Franz Mueller
- Re: Delphi Components (SynEdit) Michael Beck \(Team JEDI\)
- Re: Delphi Components (SynEdit) Michael Beck \(Team JEDI\)
- Re: Delphi Components (SynEdit) Bjorn Reese
- Re: Delphi Components (SynEdit) Michael Beck \(Team JEDI\)
- Re: Delphi Components (SynEdit) Bjorn Reese
- Re: Delphi Components (SynEdit) Frank Hecker
- Re: Delphi Components (SynEdit) Michael Beck \(Team JEDI\)
- Re: Delphi Components (SynEdit) Frank Hecker
- Re: Delphi Components (SynEdit) Per Abrahamsen
- Re: Delphi Components (SynEdit) Bjorn Reese
- Re: Delphi Components (SynEdit) Michael Beck \(Team JEDI\)
- Re: Delphi Components (SynEdit) Frank Hecker
- Re: Delphi Components (SynEdit) Bjorn Reese
- Re: Delphi Components (SynEdit) Michael Beck \(Team JEDI\)
