Nigel McFarlane wrote: > I can't believe that referencing an un-dated > URL (www.mozilla.org/MPL or /NPL) whose contents could > change at any time is the same as including > licenses with the source. There is no copy of the > GPL or LGPL in the Mozilla source. (ok, there's > a copy in various imported-but-separate libraries).
Is there not a LICENSE file at the top of the source tarball? I don't know, I don't have a source release and don't at the moment have the bandwidth to check. The LICENSE and LEGAL files are checked out as part of a developer's tree so I'd be surprised if they weren't included with the source releases. If they're not there we're violating section 3.1 which says "You must include a copy of this License with every copy of the Source Code You distribute." Not to worry, I doubt we'd sue ourselves. I'd recommend you double check, though, because I'm pretty sure you'll find the LICENSE file. If it's not there obviously we should fix it. -Dan Veditz
