If I understand the licensing correctly, this means I can release my code under any license, so long as I follow section 3.6
That is correct.
by having a "conspicuously included" notice that part of my product is build from MPL`d source and where that`s available (pointing to the source at http://www.mozilla.org )
Indeed. See the MPL FAQ linked from http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/ for a complete list of what you must do.
If the above is true, I want to release the bindings under the MIT license. Can I release my work under the other license (MIT).
Sure, no problem.
My intent is to let others add it to their works. If I can, the last concern I have is how do I ensure that the users of the product will maintain the "conspicuously included" notice, or is that my responsibility?
It is not your responsibility. If you distribute it to them with the notice, and then they remove the notice and redistribute it, they are infringing the license, but you are not.
P.S. - I am not against using the MPL or NPL, but not sure if I can provide a way for others to always have the ability to reference the source from my website.
Er... I don't quite understand what you are saying here.
Gerv _______________________________________________ mozilla-license mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-license
