Ben Bucksch wrote:
>
> TenThumbs wrote:
>
> > RFC2616 section 3.2.1 specifically adopts portions of RFc2396, not the
> > entire thing
>
> Since my URL-recognition code is generic, and has (almost) no handling
> for any special protocol, RFC2616 is, well, out of luck, if it
> disregards RFC2396.
Then this is now a standards compliance issue. If you're going to pick and
choose which standards you follow, have you posted a list?
--
Saturn
2000-12-13 22:24:49.202101 TDB (JD 2451892.433903)
X = 4.772551466, Y = 7.242370651, Z = 2.785930459
X' = -0.005043697, Y' = 0.002612637, Z' = 0.001296172
