> Some days ago I asked, why there is nothing to see, after an XSENDER is received by 
>means of the
> (unofficial) POP3 extension. Nobody could tell. Ok.
> 
> Just for curiousity reasons, I browsed the Mozilla 0.7 source code, and I cannot 
>believe it:
> Mozilla seems *really* to throw away the authenticated sender after all that effort. 
>Doesn't it?
> 
> The only trace, that I could find, is the X-Mozilla-Flag 0200, but it seems to be 
>*write only*.

There are lots of things in the code that is not quite right and you seem
to have stumbled upon one of those code parts. The problem with the newsgroup
is that everything is someone elses problem so the best way to get this fixed
one way or another (remove the command or take care of the result) is to log
a bug in Bugzilla <http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/> . If you do, please cc me on
it.


> After all, this looks looney: The mail client bugs hosts of servers, since it issues 
>XSENDER
> requests without asking for the necessary capabilities, and after all, it does 
>virtually nothing
> with the result? I cannot believe it. Really.

It could have been the intent of the programmer to use the result but then it was 
forgotten.

/Daniel


Reply via email to