Justin H. wrote:
> Jay Garcia wrote:
>>
>> Warren Bell wrote:
>>
>> > If anyone uses the old-style quoting (>) I filed a bug on how the quotes
>> > are bunched together now.
>> >
>> > Instead of reply levels being seperated like:
>> >
>> >
>> >>>>reply
>> >>>>
>> >
>> > They're bunched together like:
>> >
>> >
>> >>>>reply
>> >>>>
>> >
>> > This make everything too compacted when there's a lot of replies. If
>> > you're interested in this the bug is:
>> >
>> > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89954
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Maybe its my glasses but your two examples look identical.
>
> They wouldn't if Moz wasn't removing whitespace religiously. The first
> part of the post included spaces between the quote characters - i.e.,
> ">[space]>[space]>". The second was all bunched together - i.e.,
> ">>>". It wouldn't shock me to find out that Moz was using HTML rules
> on whitespace before and after tags to strip spaces after quote chars.
>
> Justin H.
>
Yeah, and what happens if I use >space> charactors to illistrate[sp]
somthing in my email? Is Mozilla going to decide I meant >> instead and
fix it for me? Plan text is plain text and should be sent and viewed
as-is, I don't want Mozilla adjusting it for me.
