[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben Bucksch) writes: > Dan Mosedale wrote: > > >Ugh. This means that the mailing list would not be dynamic (ie > >replies would not catch new members that had been added to the list). > >In many environments, after all, the alias is intended to be expanded > >on the mail server for just this reason. > > > But it only works, if the local mail server works together with the LDAP > server, i.e. if the mailing list on the LDAP server exists as alias at > the mail server. > > That's usually not true for "personal LDAP", i.e. a user using LDAP > (with write access) to share address book between multiple clients.
Good point. Sounds like this needs to be preference-controlled per server. Dan
