Ben Bucksch wrote (much snipped): > There are strong (and IMO prohibitive) reasons why this bug is a very > bad idea: > > * the message would be malformed. > * As said, many mailers will remove the sig (as defined above) > during reply > * The sig is arguably less important than the quoted msg
If nobody can defeat the above reasons (esp. the first 2 ones), I will go and mark it wontfix.
