Hi Michael, I tried to replicate this with the 11/22 nightly builds and it seemed to work ok. Anyway, please try this :
If u already have Mozilla installed make sure all messaging apps including earlier versions of Netscape / Mozilla are closed. Run Mozilla, go to "Edit/Preferences" and select the "Mail and Newsgroups" category and check "Use Mozilla as the default mail application" preference and click OK. If it is already checked, uncheck it click OK and close Mail. Start Mail again and set it again. Now try doing the send from Word. I can help you with this to make sure that you are able to use Mozilla with MAPI apps. thanks, - Rajiv. Michael Collette wrote: > Been going through the numerous bug reports and group postings concerning > MAPI support in Mozilla to figure out what all is going on. I'm completely > lost at this point. > > On Windows NT 4.0 Workstation I'm trying to get Word 97 to send a document > via Mozilla. From what I've read, it seems that the proper DLL's are in > place, the registry settings for default mail look good, and it'll even > bring up Mozilla if it's not already started. Now if I didn't get this > error message... > > Logon failed. You must log on to Microsoft Exchange to access your > address book. > Error code: "Unspecified error". > > ...coming back from MS Word everything would be just dandy. Back when the > user in question had NS 4.7x as the default mail client this apparently > worked without a hitch, so I don't believe it's a Word issue. > > Tried doing this with a download of a nightly build today, but no luck. > Worse yet, from the wide variety of notes I'm not even sure if the MAPI > code landed in the nightly builds or not. If it has, I'd be happy to get a > new bug report going and all. I just need to know where things stand. > > Better yet, if there's a reasonable work around to this problem all the > better. I've got a couple of users who are literally looking to pull > Mozilla off their systems and go back to NS 4.7x because of this silliness. > These were my guinea pig users to see if I could deploy company wide yet. > Perhaps a kind of minor point to me, but apparently pretty major to them. > > Thanks, >
