Matthew Thomas wrote: > > There are two problems with that.
Making it three addresses long would probably fix both. [shrug] > Actually, I think the address pane should show as many rows as there are > recipients. If there are 200 recipients, there should be 200 rows. Hmm, a less drastic change along the same lines would be to make it as big as there are recipients (plus one additional blank one to make it obvious how to type in another) up to a maximum number - four, perhaps five or six. Past that, it would be scrollable like it it today. > I realized this while reading stories > <http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/03/02/1415251> about people > replying to hundreds of individual recipients (as opposed to mailing > lists) without realizing it. Interesting. Most other email clients would have the same problem anyway, wouldn't they? I don't think I've seen a GUI client that doesn't use a scrollable chome list of some sort for recipient addresses (but then again I've only used really ever used mail, pine, Netscape and Moz). I certainly wouldn't have a problem with the recipient list being 100% long.. you could probably still use the chrome that we have for it today, by "just" making it a part of the scrollable aread of the compose window. Mike. -- Mike Gratton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <http://web.vee.net/> "Every motive escalate."
