Garth Wallace wrote:
> Brian Heinrich wrote:
> 
>> Garth Wallace wrote:
>>
>>> Brian Heinrich wrote:
>>>
>>>> Christopher Jahn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> And it came to pass that Brian Heinrich wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.  URL is http://ufaq.org (just ufaq will send you to
>>>>>> a .com site).  But downloading AIM just so I can access my
>>>>>> Web Mail account is, well, dumb.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's easier to use AIM to access Webmail's proprietary format than 
>>>>> to re-write Mozilla Mail to do it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Agreed.
>>>>
>>>> The comment was more of a fit of pique with AOL/T-W on my part than 
>>>> anything.  Why would I want to download a chat client that's a pain 
>>>> in the ass to remove fully and completely when no-one I know uses 
>>>> it?  And it's not like I make /that/ much use of my Web Mail account.
>>>>
>>>> After finding myself using recent Mozilla builds with increasing 
>>>> regularity, I've pretty much made the switch over.  Even on my old 
>>>> P-200 box, it runs well (unlike, say, NS 6.2.1), and it's ever more 
>>>> stable.
>>>>
>>>> Now if only it would support HTTP mail so I could check my Hotmail 
>>>> account, which is usually so full of spam I can't find any legit 
>>>> messages. . . .  (Yeesh. . . .)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> That's another proprietary protocol. And Microsoft is *really* 
>>> unlikely to open it up to Mozilla developers, just their own in-house 
>>> staff who work on Outlook.
>>>
>>
>> True, but at least I can directly access it in Mozilla without having 
>> to go thro' the log-in process, so that's all right by me, since, as I 
>> said, it's usually choc-a-bloc with spam.  And it's almost quicker to 
>> do it that way than to have OE check it, so I'm not complaining.
>>
>> But I'll ask the question I didn't ask before:  are there HTTP mail 
>> services that might be accessible thro' Mozilla?  Of the two with 
>> which I have any acquaintance, Hotmail is proprietary, and canada.com 
>> seems not to support that kind of access. . . .
> 
> 
> I think most webmail providers do just what it sounds like--allow access 
> to email over the web (i.e. through webpages and CGI). Some may also 
> allow access through the standard email protocols: POP3 (or IMAP) and 
> SMTP. Funky nonstandard mail protocols are fortunately rare.
> 

About what I figured.  Still, I thought it was worth asking. . . .

Thanks.

— Brian

-- 

‘We have seen the enemy and he is us’ — Walt Kelly’s Pogo


Reply via email to