On 20.06.02 12:55, Jon Thaler Replied As Follows:

--- Original Message ---

> Christopher Jahn wrote:
>> And it came to pass that Jon Thaler wrote:
> 
>>>... M's address book utility
>>>has two undesirable features (unless I've missed
>>>something): 
>>>
>>>* One can't display or search for cards in more than one
>>>address book at a time.
>>>
>>>* If I want a person to appear in more than one address
>>>book ... I end up with multiple copies of that
>>>   person's card. 
>>>
>>>Entourage X does this right.  That's one of its few
>>>advantages over Mozilla. 
>> 
>> Why do you need ten address books?  It sounds to me like what 
>> you want is ONE address book, with ten lists set up in each.  
>> This would solve all the problems you've mentioned without re-
>> inventing the wheel.
> 
> This works, in a way, but is a kludge.  An address book is not a
> mailing list.
> * A group of people is not necessarily a list to which I'd want
>    to send email.  (OK, this is not a big deal, although one loses
>    some protection against mistakes.)
> * I cannot put mailing lists into the lists.  I think this has
>    been discussed elsewhere.  For example, I cannot make a
>    subcommittee list inside a committee list.  (This *is* a big
>    deal.)
> * I cannot search for a name only within a selected list (or set
>    of  lists).  This is an issue when one has hundreds of contacts.
> * I cannot display the combined contents of two selected lists.
>    In particular, duplicate entries could be removed.  One could
>    then avoid sending multiple messages to someone who is a member
>    of two lists.
> * I cannot examine a card and learn anything about what lists that
>    person belongs to.  I do know which address book it's in.
> 
> These issues could be resolved, but I don't think it's "reinventing the 
> wheel."  Functionality is missing.
> 
> What use, if any, do you perceive for multiple address books? 
> Personally, I think that having a single class do everyhing is ugly and 
> probably difficult to maintain.
> 
> Regards,
> Jon Thaler
> 

Make two lists, "subcommittee" and "committee".

Name each list accordingly and add the appropriate addresses to each list.

When you compose an email:

 To: field is blank
 Bcc: subcommittee

 or Bcc: committee

SEND


-- 
Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion
Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI
UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
** Post To Group ONLY, do NOT email **


Reply via email to