I searched and found:
Bugzilla Bug 121728 RFE: Ability to Edit/delete attachments in mail/news

I would love to see this enhancement implemented to let my mail users eliminate several dozen gigabytes of attachments that are almost certainly already saved elsewhere on the corporate network. Disk space may be relatively inexpensive, but this duplicated data still needs to be backed up.

I voted for this bug, and would like to see the features Joan proposed (preferably record the date and time of attachment removal) documented in the Bugzilla 121728 enhancement request:

File:       Very_Big_Binary
Removed on: 02/07/02 11:15:23
Saved in :  /users/Tom/data/big_files

This information would improve user productivity and reduce "where did I save this" support calls.

Regards,

William Bayer
Manager, I.T.
Komatsu Canada Limited



Brian Heinrich wrote:
On 10 Jul 2002, it is alleged that Joan Malagarriga sauntered in to
netscape.public.mozilla.mail-news and loudly proclaimed:

> Hi,
> I do get a lot of e-Mails with Attachments at work. So my Mail Folders are quite big.
> Lately I saw a nice feature in MUTT (linux VIO Mailer).
> With MUTT you can remove the attachments from the mail, you donn't copy
> the file to an other location but you move it there. On the other side
> when you open a Mail with a removed attachement you see a message saying
> something like " The attachement "Important_document" has been removed
> from this e-Mail"
> This would be a nice feature which would keep Mail Accounts lean.
> As an  enhancement to this would be nice if this "removed attachment"
> had some properties like: Where is the attachment saved and when.
> On the GUI level you could gray out the "removed attachment"-Name, so
> you can see the mail had some attachements, but somathing has happened
> to them. And with a RMB you should get a Properties Dialog where it says:
>
> File: Very_Big_Binary
> Removed on: 02/07/02
> Saved in : /users/Tom/data/big_files

You might want to do a Bugzilla search on that; it's come up often enough
that there's almost certain to be at least one bug open on it (which would
have my vote, BTW . . . ).

/b.

--

Mozilla end-user questions should be directed to:
                snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.mozilla.user.general
                snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.mozilla.user.win32
                snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.mozilla.user.mac
                snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.mozilla.user.unix

Note that you need to have SSL enabled and the port set to 563.

Reply via email to