In article <ah6jos$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jay Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17.07.02 22:43, Ben Bucksch Replied As Follows: -snip- > > As Mozilla used User-Agent only, that's what is being displayed. > > > > Yes, you could display both or either, but it's a hidden pref only > > anyways, and any addition supposedly makes the code slower (at least > > that's what mscott said). > > I'm basically interested in just what the difference is between x-mailer > and user_agent, if any, and why one would choose to display one over the > other. It's "User-Agent" not "User_Agent". The difference is that UA has a defined syntax which makes it possible to parse it. In news X-Mailer is mainly used by older versions of Netscape. As for why one over the other -- generally it shouldn't be a problem, it should be either/or not both. -- J.B. Moreno
