Proxies is a whole other ball of wax. This is focused purely on lower-level
connectivity issues.
Steve Meredith wrote:
> Does it make sense to add proxies to this document? Or is that addressed
> in some other set of tests?
>
> Ben Chuang wrote:
>
> > Try again. There was a brief outage that weekend.
> >
> > Anandprasanna Gaitonde wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hello sir,
> >>
> >>I am interested in going thru the document which u have mentioned in the
> >>link. but i was unable to access the link. Is there any problem with the
> >>site . can u kindly let me know where the document is or if possible send it
> >>to me.
> >>
> >>Thanking in advance
> >>
> >>Regards
> >>Prasanna
> >>
> >>"Dan Mosedale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >>9g83nf$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9g83nf$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >>
> >>>Ben Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>>
> >>>>Now that I've been doing network qa for netscape for a while, I've
> >>>>started to realize there is a whole set of functionality that has not
> >>>>been explicity explored, which I have tentatively called "general
> >>>>connectivity".
> >>>>
> >>>>The document is in pretty horrible shape (being a draft from a quiet
> >>>>Saturday morning), but a discussion in bug 84019 about modem and proxy
> >>>>testing made me think I better post the draft, rather than continuing to
> >>>>work on the document in the fast-LAN ivory tower we call the Netscape
> >>>>Campus network...
> >>>>
> >>>>http://www.packetgram.com/pktg/mozilla/nettest.html
> >>>>
> >>>>Please read it and send your comments here, but be kind.
> >>>>
> >>>>benc
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>This is great stuff! I think we've needed just this sort of analysis
> >>>for a while; good work.
> >>>
> >>>Dan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>
> >
