sounds to me like you have discovered a bug in mozilla. can you please file it on http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ ...thx!
darin Gavin Brelstaff wrote: > Hi Stuart, > I still do get a cached copy if I use: > > <meta HTTP-EQUIV="Cache-Control" CONTENT="no-store"/> > > In any case - I've now started to use Apache mod-header to write > the > Pragma: no-cache > explicitly in the HTTP header instead of the HTML META section > and > now the cached version is NOT presented in Netscape 6.2 when I > attempt to go back to that page in the history list. > That's giving me most of the behavior I want- i.e. to forget > user/passwd > in the basic authorization scheme. > Still I need to be careful not to write confidential > stuff to the document title - as that does show up in the > history. > > > \Gavin > > > Stuart Ballard wrote: > >>Gavin Brelstaff wrote: >> >>>Jonas >>>Thanks for the suggestion but the >>> >>><meta http-equiv="Cache-Control" content="no-cache"/> >>> >>>doesn't make any difference - perhaps it's a bug. >>> >>Try "no-store" instead of "no-cache". That tells the browser >> > never to > >>even store the document in it's cache, which apparently means >> > that it > >>can't even be shown by back-button history. >> >>I don't like the idea of the server being able to prevent you >> > from > >>correctly going back, but I've heard that mozilla does >> > implement and > >>honor that flag. I don't have first-hand knowledge though, so >> > try it and > >>see. >> >>Stuart. >>
