Hello!

I have been using the latest EMX build a bit now, and it is indeed a LOT 
faster than the VACPP build.. Actually it's very close to that of NS 
4.61. Only some interface elements are a tad slower, page rendering is 
now REALLY faster.. not just in theory. Which means that while it still 
hogs CPU while it's working, it doesn't for nearly as long as before..

So my question is: is this because the VACPP is less optimized, or is 
there a huge difference in the compilers themselves? I heard that VACPP 
3.6.5 and 4.x have some nasty bugs in the optimizer code... No idea what 
impact that would have on the Warpzilla build though..

And is there any "drawbacks" with the EMX build that I haven't noticed 
yet? Anything that won't work/can't work?


Best regards,
Eirik Overby


Reply via email to