On Thu, 08 Nov 2001 13:18:09 -0600 Michael Kaply <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you find a hang in Warpzilla PLEASE test it WITHOUT Java. > > We need to know whether the hang is a Warpzilla hang or a Java hang. > > If I see bugs that are opened as hangs without explicitly saying that > Java was NOT involved or the page that hangs has Java on it, I will mark > the bug INVALID. > > My team does not own the Java plugin and we can't fix bugs in it. > > Mike Kaply > IBM
I realize that the team working on Warpzilla has finite resources. But so do users. I think that a request to not submit hangs which occur in \java13 (or in npoji6.dll) is perfectly legitimate, if you don't own those. But what does "If you find a hang in Warpzilla PLEASE test it WITHOUT Java" mean ? Why are you saying that bugs will be marked INVALID if the page that hangs has <EMBED> html somewhere, __whether or not__ Preferences -> Advanced -> Enable Java was *disabled* at the time ? Suppose a crash occurs in xpcom.dll. Are you *really* asking the user to examine ALL the received html (e.g., in Warpzilla's memory and disk caches) to certify that "Java was not involved" ?? mikus
