Michael Kaply wrote:
> 6. Please please please try it on another operating system besides OS/2
> if you have it. Knowing whether or not a problem is crossplatform helps
> more than you know. I know that most of you use OS/2 only, and I
> understand, but I also know that a lot of people have a Windows machine
> somewhere.
I also have a windoze machine, but disk space allocated to it is severly
limited. I already spend 1 hr 40 min to download an OS/2 build on 26K
POTS. Can't do that for Mickey's OS. Don't know enuf about how to fix it
when it breaks even if I had a cable modem. I wonder about others who
don't have the bandwidth problem but are handicapped by the same other
windoze (or Linux) limitations as I? Great when people can duplicate on
windoze (or Linux), but maybe not so easy for many to get into a
position to do so.
> I'm starting to think that the newsgroup is the right place to discuss
> the bug and when people confirm it, then we open Bugzilla bug..
May be a good idea. I used to do that a lot more and didn't often get
useful comments. Anyone ever try to figure out just how many people
actually participate in this group? Seems the number isn't very big.
> As it stands, we have a ton of bugs that we have never been able to
> recreate and we don't know what to do with them.
I looked at the (17) unconfirmeds - see other post. Is there a way to
search for the rest of those that are sitting only due to failure to
recreate (status assigned and/or new, but what other criteria to rule
out those that have been recreated)?
--
"The fear of the Lord is the beginning of all knowledge . . . ."
Proverbs 1:7 NIV
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409
Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.members.atlantic.net/
