On Mon, 20 May 2002 11:45:10 -0500, Frodo Baggins wrote:
> I dumped the source to take a look and it is a very >good example in how NOT to code HTML. Unbalanced tables, nested >divisions, everything the manual says not to do... The whole problem is >that Mozilla is much more strict in interpreting HTML than the "previous >generation browsers". > >The major issue is that HTML "developers" have been writing their pages >for broken browsers and not for the standards they were supposed to be >following. Unfortunately, in situations like this, you get the sloppy >results. > Oh dear, it is only recently that I managed to persuade them to offer their newsalert emails in plain text (and not solely in putrid html). I'll sit on this for a while. -- Howard
