Nicky,

Nicky Morrow wrote:
> 
> Julien,
> 
> Thanks for pointing this bug out to us.  I read the whole thing and then voted for 
>it.
> 
> I absolutely agree with everything you said...well done.  I do think that my 
>description above goes farther than this bug (I think there are probably about 3 bugs 
>involved here) but this bug is certainly a contributor to the confusion...and it 
>appears to be getting no attention at all.
> 
> IMO, the behavior of email and the Get Msgs button is terrible when using a pop 
>server.  To this day I primarily use 4.61 for mail and newgroups due primarily to the 
>confusing behavior we are talking about in this msg.  While the browser has made 
>excellent progress and is deserving of a v1 release I can't say the same for 
>email/newsgroups at this point.

I think a big part of the problem is POP vs IMAP . POP support isn't
getting as much attention, and the new UI design really suits only IMAP.
It's not logical in the POP model to do things in multiple small steps
like it is in IMAP.

FYI, I'm using Communicator for mail & news , both at home and work, not
Mozilla. That should tell you something about what I think of the
current Mozilla mail & news. I have many other problems than this one
unfortunately, this is just a minor annoyance with a workaround.

-- 
"Except for the lack of debugging and the ps thing, [Linux] kernel
threads are generally fine right now. And if you're not too fussed
about the more fiddly details of POSIX threads, and your application
doesn't spend most of its time in thread creation, then LinuxThreads
is great too."

  Linux-Kernel archive

Reply via email to