I still need Smart Cache. Firstly, I find it's caching abilities to be better than most available for Os/2. Secondly, it's on my gateway machine so all machines on my network (Os/2 or other) can take advantage of what other machines have browsed.
As far as blocking advertising banners go, I actually prefer Mozilla because of the ease of adding a site to the list (just rightclick and block). Alan Beagley wrote: > Do people find that Mozilla's cookie-handling capabilities are equal to > those of SmartCache or Internet JunkBuster? I guess we still need one of > those to try to block advertising banners, porn sites, etc., but can we > leave <ozill to deal with the cookies? > > -=- > Alan >
