You're probably right. Everyone has a different idea about terminology. Wasn't there a time when preliminary versions were called something like "Mozillaxxxxrc1"? Some other programs have "ProgramNamePrev1". usually names like Mozilla11b indicate fixed versions after an intolerable bug is detected.
There are a lot of different drummers to get used to marching to. On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 13:35:18 UTC, Alan Beagley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> opined: > I assumed that 1.1a and 1.1b were shorthand for "1.1 alpha" and "1.1 beta" >repectively and that we now have "1.1 released/final version." > > -=- > Alan > > > Stan Goodman wrote: > > With great trepidation, I would like to ask how it is that the release > > now under discussion is Mozilla v1.1, while we have had v1.1b for over > > a month? > > > > No criticism here, I just want to understand -- in the hope that this > > would lead me also to understand why Java2 releases have numbers like > > v1.3. > -- Stan Goodman, Qiryat Tiv'on, Israel Please replace "SPAM-FOILER" with "sgoodman". 200 years of European fecklessness in the face of Arab terror: Tripoli Pirates (1814); OPEC Oil (1973); Saddam Hussein and Yasser Arafat (1990 et seq.) -- but actually financing it is a 21st-century European wrinkle.
