Stan Goodman wrote: > On Thu, 29 Aug 2002 21:59:52 UTC, Michael Kaply <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > opined: > > >>Since I am an IBM employee, I will reserve my comments to something >>constructive. >> >>Suffice to say the HTML is completely wrong, we have informed them of >>the problem and they said "we don't support Netscape 6 or Mozilla" > > > Every age has its preferred copout; "We don't support > <fillintheblank>" is *The* Copout Of The First Decade Of The 21st > Century. My ISP uses it all the time: "We don't support OS/2" (I have > never expected them to, but it is a way of blowing me off when I ask > about malfunctions in their modems.) > > The Mozilla Releases page, right next to the link for the OS/2 > version, announces that it is an IBM port. I hope you will ask your > colleagues how it is that IBM ports Mozilla (and modifies it into IBM > Web Browser) but does not support it. >
IBM has been a divided "company" for many years.
