Michael K Greene wrote: > On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:25:03, Michael Kaply <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Looks like that fixed things, should know soon... > > What is the difference between the RC.EXE from your link and the > RC.EXE in my C:\OS2 directory? Is that one also broke?
Boy is that a long story. All RC compilers have at least one bug that hurts us. To get the build working, we had to find the "best fit" I believe the problem with the default OS/2 RC.EXE is that it doesn't search the INCLUDE path for icons and bitmaps, it only searches it for headers. that was fixed in the toolkit RC.EXE. Unfortunately, though, the OS/2 RC.EXE has one main advantage over the toolkit RC.EXE which is only an issue for the GCC build - the OS/2 RC.EXE allows paths with forward slashes. Anyway, that's the long and short of it. Mike
