Can't say I didn't predict exactly this a couple weeks ago...
"Steve Elmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Everyone,
>
> Now that we've spent a few weeks using the nsbeta1 and nsbeta1-
> keywords, we've found that there is a definite need for the nsbeta1+
> keyword. The driving factor is that without nsbeta1+ there is no
> simple, uniform way to distinguish bugs that have been evaluated from
> new nominations. (Newly nominated bugs come into the teams with various
> random settings of priority and milestone, making them look just like
> bugs that have already been examined and accepted for consideration.)
> Each team has been using its own ad-hoc method for marking these bugs
> and we want to simplify that by standardizing on nsbeta1+ instead.
>
> Bugs with the nsbeta1+ keyword are still under consideration for
> inclusion in the next release, _not_ committed. Only bugs with a
> milestone have been committed. (And all nsbeta1 bugs being worked on in
> the mozilla0.8 and mozilla0.9 milestones should be marked with those
> milestones at this point.)
>
> Please continue to focus on the milestone unless you are actively
> participating in evaluating bugs.
>
> Steve
>
>
