Marc Attinasi wrote:
>
> I just want to make sure I am testing the correct builds here. Right now
> we are building tip-o'-the-day (2/2) and will get performance numbers
> for that. For the 'before' test, I am going off of the charts on the
> performance newsgroup and it looks like we need to go back to a build
> from the 19th to see what has slowed down since then. Does this sound
> right? Comparing performance data between a build from 1/19 and a build
> from 2/2?
Yes, those would be the correct dates. After the 19th, there was the style
checkin on the 21st that led to one slowdown. Something else landed on the
23rd to slow things further. The style checkin was backed out on the 24th,
and that brought times back down, but with the 23rd checkin, still above
times for week of 19th.
John
>
> Thanks,
> - marc
>
> Marc Attinasi wrote:
>
> >
> > Christine Hoffman and I will be running before and after Gecko
> > Performance reports to see where it slowed down today. I'll post info
> > as it is available. Keep in mind that we can only learn if Gecko
> > slowed down from these tests (parser, content creation, style
> > resolution, reflow). If the slowdown is outside of Gecko, we will only
> > learn that much.
> >
> > - marc
> >
> > Steve Clark wrote:
> >
> >> Do we know what *part* of page load got slower? is it anything in
> >> layout (style resolution, reflow, etc.?) marc's perf tests run on
> >> code before and after the slowdown could help identify (or at least
> >> eliminate) what areas got slower.
> >>
> >> Chris Waterson wrote:
> >>
> >>> We have still made zero progress on this:. A week has gone by, and page
> >>> load is still down by 13%. Here are the people that are on the hook
> >>> during the time that the slowdown occurred. If I made a quick look
> >>> through the deltas
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> http://bonsai.mozilla.org/showcheckins.cgi?&treeid=SeaMonkey&batchid=453
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> If had to guess, I'd say that darin and ftang should be reviewing their
> >>> changes...
> >>>
> >>> chris
> >>>
> >>> Chris Hofmann wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> The following people are on "the hook", since they have made checkins
> >>>> to the tree since it last opened:
> >>>>
> >>>> Who What
> >>>> Peter.VanderBeken%pandora.be2 changes
> >>>> av%netscape.com 1 change
> >>>> axel%pike.org 7 changes
> >>>> beard%netscape.com 1 change (1 while tree closed!)
> >>>> ben%netscape.com 1 change
> >>>> bienvenu%netscape.com 2 changes
> >>>> blakeross%telocity.com 10 changes
> >>>> brade%netscape.com 1 change
> >>>> ccarlen%netscape.com 14 changes
> >>>> cls%seawood.org 1 change
> >>>> darin%netscape.com 34 changes (2 while tree closed!)
> >>>> dbaron%fas.harvard.edu 5 changes (4 while tree closed!)
> >>>> dmose%mozilla.org 1 change
> >>>> dr%netscape.com 1 change
> >>>> jj%netscape.com 1 change (1 while tree closed!)
> >>>> kin%netscape.com 19 changes
> >>>> mcafee%netscape.com 8 changes (8 while tree closed!)
> >>>> mkaply%us.ibm.com 4 changes (2 while tree closed!)
> >>>> mscott%netscape.com 2 changes
> >>>> neeti%netscape.com 1 change
> >>>> nhotta%netscape.com 1 change (1 while tree closed!)
> >>>> racham%netscape.com 15 changes
> >>>> radha%netscape.com 1 change
> >>>> sspitzer%netscape.com 1 change
> >>>> timeless%mac.com 2 changes
> >>>> yokoyama%netscape.com 1 change
> >>>> 137 checkins.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Marc Attinasi - Software Engineer - Netscape
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <--> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
