Niko Pavlicek wrote:
>
> John Morrison wrote:
>
> > David Valentine wrote:
> >
> >> Does not run in 0.8, and not sure what needs to be done to make it run
> >> in 0.8 (or 1.0)
> >>
> >> http://12.13.171.162/time/time.htm
> >
> >
> > That is absolutely gorgeous! Really nice.
>
> yes, it's very cool!
>
> > I got it to run in mozilla with this simple diff, although I'll leave it
> > to someone more knowledgeable as to whether this is the right solution.
What I meant, in part, was that I just jammed in a check for document.getElementById
after a check for document.all, when in fact, you could likely just use
document.getElementById
for both mozilla and current IE.
> > It doesn't run as quickly in mozilla as it should. Could you file a bug?
> > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/
>
> yes, it runs very slow in mozilla :-(
> did someone file the slowness bug?
I filed http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70156
>
> > [..] diffs
>
> ok, with these changes it works, but there are still many errors in the
> page, e.g. all the ";" at the end of line in JavaScript are missing.
> I got a validated version at
> http://www.html-online.de/niko.temp/time/time.html
Um, the semicolon has always been optional, in general, in javascript. It's
not an error to not include them.
John
> Niko!
> --
> Niko Pavlicek
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ----------------------------
