Carcarlo wrote: > > My opinion is that it will be better a separate file with the "browser > only" version, without mail and the other modules. > In Europe we pay to connect, and dowloading a file of 3 MB is cheaper > than downloading one of 10 MB. > Many people would download a browser of 3 MB, just to try it. But > nobody will attempt do download one of 10 MB just for curiosity. > We have slower connections and modems (I've a 33.6 k). > > I think a smaller Mozilla file size would help the browser to spread. Yes, you are right. But i belive if you use Netscapes installer you only have to download the files you select. E.g. you download a small installer, then the installer downloads the files (navigator) you selected. I think they should drop the mail/news since there are quite a lot of good e-mail apps already. And focus more on the Navigator. Also the composer, i´m a little unsure of its role ? I mean it is ok for simpler web cmoposing stuff, but its a replica of the composer in 4.x. Hoping for a quick stable mozilla 1.0 REMEMBER you cant release a 1.0 untill all KNOWN bugs are resolved. I think programmers and program managers should start to learn that, since the quality of computer programs have degenerated the last years...Mozilla is looking promising though.
