Notes of the branch planning meeting on Friday.
We have some serious regressions on the builds from
late last week we need to get resolve before moving on
to any additional landings and carpools.

chris h.

Chris Hofmann wrote:

 
recap and current bug list status...
 -mscott mail perf
     things going well.  all known landing regressions resolved.
 
 -gagan,gordon,darin, beard on necko cache
     all landed.  16 bugs on the status summary = [cache] regression list
 
 
 -pav,saari on libpr0n
     win32 only was turned on as of Friday.  Other platforms coming.
     pav to develop cache regression bug list and post. Its started as
     a status summary = [libpr0n] bugzilla list.

     mscott helping with http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73250
        -infinite loop when trying to read messages with image attachments.
     http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67454  need to be checked
         to see if can be removed.

     phil reports memory use goes to 90MBs on win32 after running jrgm's
         pageloader speed test.   darin, pav, and others to investigate
         since libr0n is the first user of the memory cache.  Need
         a bunch of eyes on this...

    jrgm also reports mixed results on page loading times where we should
     be taking advantage of the cache, but first time page loads have
     regressed posted results to performance news group.  see attached
     and bug  http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73295

     pav has the bug now, but we need others with checkins from late
     last week to look at the problem to eliminate the possibility of regression
     or side effects from other changes for view manager, necko,
     don't repaint dirty rect.  http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37779
     and any others that might have positive or negative effect on page
     loading times.
 
 

 
 -hewitt,blakeross,... - xul reorging


     [EMAIL PROTECTED] and blakeross have other changes with
     impact coming.   should carpool and wait until we get the
     resent performance and mem use regressions cleared.
 

 

future landings updates
 -scc large number of string changes.

        no update...
        branch/build instructions?
        experimental build evaluation/testing results?
        landing regression bug list?
 
 
 -bidi  - erik
        no update
        branch/build instructions?
       experimental build evaluation/testing results?
        landing regression bug list?
 
 -lord  javi ddrianan
       no update
       branch/build instructions?
       experimental build evaluation/testing results?
       landing regression bug list?
 
 -jband/jst XPConnect/Dom conversion.
 
       jband might be ready towards the end of 0.9
       jst to follow jband.
       branch is not quite ready for addtional testing help.
 


Here's the test results for today, reported in the same way as other days,
where I'm taking the average of the median reported load time for each URL.

In mac comm. verification builds, the new cache is not enabled, but the old
cache is not working either (as yesterday), so times for today are about the
same overall as yesterday.

In the win32 and linux comm. verification builds for today, the new cache is
working. With the old cache, by the time we returned to a given page, we had
already evicted the images from that page from the cache (due to the 512 entry
limit). However, now, a second visit to the same URL will load the images from
the cache, and that would be faster than loading them from the network. So,
this result is really now reporting the "if-cached" load times for these URLs.

The drop in the reported time on win32 is due primarily to the fact that it 
stops reporting ~20sec times for slashdot, expedia and voodooextreme, dropping
the average down by ~1.2 seconds. It also began timing out (never firing onload)
for voodooextreme, tomshardward, cnn, and msn. 

Note: win32 performance when things are "in the cache" is not significantly better
than in builds of 3/21 or 3/19. But, it's "initial visit" times are ~30%
slower in 3/23 than in 3/21. Bug coming up.

Oddly, linux shows the opposite: when things are "in the cache", page load times
are about 85% of the "initial visit" in the 3/23 build. Page load times for 
the "initial visit" are not significantly different in builds of 3/19, 3/21 
and 3/23. (pinkerton: what's the greek word for this? Perplexos?)

GIF image



Reply via email to