Chris Hoess wrote: <snip> > How about 86869, 91073, 91074, and 91439 for starters.
Gemal is a long time contributor (and, incidentially, the top bug reporter in the entire database) and knows how to drive patches. I've sent email to the owners asking for review or comment. These aren't > actually examples of what I was originally thinking of, but they're worth > a look. (Actually, ISTR an earlier proposal [Gerv?] about having some > sort of expedited review process for minor string changes like this, but > AFAIK nothing came of it.) Something did come of it. UI string changes and spelling fixes and such no lonnger require super-review. This expidites the chage but it still has to be reviewed by the module owner to make sure it's a change that should be made. <snip> > Maybe my perception is just skewed. I'll try trolling for patches in some > of the areas I'm familiar with and tagging them correctly with patch > manager. > If you find more bugs with patches that are being overlooked or ignored please email me directly and I'll see what I can do. Thanks. --Asa
