At 16:25 16/12/2000 +0000, Simon P. Lucy wrote:
>At 12:43 16/12/2000 +0000, rvj wrote:
>>Belated - many thanks for reply
>>
>>I had been thinking along the lines of a totally chrome driven application
>>shell.
>>
>>I had assumed access to DLLs within JARS possible, but impractical for
>>preformance reasons.
>>
>>i.e. a single external DLL which redirects access to the appropriate DLL
>>within one or more JARs (decompress/load DLL on the fly)
>>
>>But this sound like your private file system solution?
>
>It does but remember that for DLLs to be loaded they have to be visible to 
>the user loading them, whether its in a private file system or not.  The 
>only real advantage of private file systems is where you need a very 
>efficient storage granularity, because once they are mounted they are 
>available to all.

There are, of course, entirely private file systems but you can't have 
system objects in DLLs in there.  Well I guess you could keep them in 
there, copy them out to a regular file system before they are needed and 
then delete them afterwards.  I'm not sure as I see the point of that though.

Simon


Reply via email to