Gervase Markham wrote: > Of the above, I suggest we populate "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", because it's > IMO the most sensible and appropriate of the five.
Am I the only one who thinks [EMAIL PROTECTED] is too ambiguous? How about [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from the RFP paper) or [EMAIL PROTECTED]? That way people will know exactly what it's for. That will cut down on irrelevant messages from the clueless. For the other alias, the private group mailing list, dveditz suggested [EMAIL PROTECTED] That one sounds good to me, it's shorter, but less ambiguous than some alternatives. Gerv, why should the vulnerabilities page be at http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/known-vulnerabilities/index.html? I don't understand why this is the better option. Does every new page added have to be an index.html page? I wanted to post this policy in the same place as the vulnerabilities page, so does the policy need to go at /projects/security/security-bug-policy/index.html? I don't like putting each page in its own directory, if that's what you're suggesting. Please explain. Bradley, we could archive the private mailing list somewhere if we feel it necessary...just one more thing to maintain as far as I'm concerned. We can talk about that later. -Mitch
