On Tuesday 14 June 2005 03:10, Tyler Close wrote:
> Hi Heikki,
> 
> On 6/13/05, Heikki Toivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > and are willing to pay for the chrome real estate it takes.
> 
> I don't understand this complaint. The petname tool is *tiny*. It's
> just a text field.


I've been thinking about this.  I think the chrome / real estate
argument may be out of date.  Which is to say it needs to be
re-tested by the HCI folks.

Here's the thing.  Back in 1995 there were chrome wars going
on and it was an issue.  But those days were with advanced
users, people who drove their browsers.  Anyone on the net
then knew what a modem was.

In the intervening decade we've shifted user base and now
there are ordinary people who use browsers.  Someone's Mom,
for example.  These people don't drive their browsers, they
are transported by them.  They simply don't have the skills
or viewpoint that makes them care about the arcania of chrome
and real eastate.

Observation that I've seen bears this out, and not just in the
mild, but dramatically:  I've noticed that ordinary users who
are not computer people use several, sometimes half a dozen
toolbars.  So much so that the display component for the HTML
is reduced to as little as a third of the real estate.  And they're
quite happy.

I've even pointed this out a couple of times, to these users,
and had a bit of trouble getting my point through.  And when
they do get it, they shrug and ignore it.  They're happy with
their laughably reduced real estate, and toolbars competing
to waste the chrome.  They do what users do, ignore me coz
I'm not talking to their interests, just another techie with another
woftam idea.

So I suspect the "real estate" argument is in need of re-testing.
We may find from user experiments that it no longer applies,
it might have really been a techie thing all along, and that
user base is no longer as dominating as it was.

Ping, Tyler, Amir, any chance of factoring that into your tests?
(No I'm not sure how you'd test this ...)

iang
-- 
Advances in Financial Cryptography, Issue 1:
   https://www.financialcryptography.com/mt/archives/000458.html
Daniel Nagy, On Secure Knowledge-Based Authentication
Adam Shostack, Avoiding Liability: An Alternative Route to More Secure Products
Ian Grigg, Pareto-Secure
_______________________________________________
Mozilla-security mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-security

Reply via email to