> That's one of the reasons that made me start my XPLC project. If XPCOM > had been more of a standalone project that isn't so specific to Mozilla > (or anything else), there would have had only a few other more technical > points to fix and I wouldn't have even started XPLC. Who else is using XPLC? I really don't know. Any chance of (re-)unification? I'm not accusing you of NIH syndrome, but it is a real problem, in open source as well as in closed source. APR exists instead of being a use of NSPR, IMO, due to NIH + unbalanced license phobia. /be
- Re: XPCOM.org? Gervase Markham
- Re: XPCOM.org? jesus X
- Re: XPCOM.org? Rick Parrish
- Re: XPCOM.org? Daniel Veditz
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Gervase Markham
- Re: XPCOM.org? Rick Parrish
- Re: XPCOM.org? Chris Waterson
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Brendan Eich
- Re: XPCOM.org? Brendan Eich
- Re: XPCOM.org? Jon Smirl
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Rick Parrish
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Ari Heitner
- Re: XPCOM.org? Brendan Eich
- Re: XPCOM.org? Simon P. Lucy
- Re: XPCOM.org? Brendan Eich
