> At some point someone will likely write a generic component that > uses the type library info (just like XPConnect) to proxy Thats basically what I was thinking of doing, hence also the question about XPIDL support for nontrivial parameter types. Sounds like this would be a start-from-scratch job.... Just noticed that you are the author of the IBM XPCOM intro articles - nice job! Cheers, Chris.
- XPCOM across processes and machines Topics Man
- Re: XPCOM across processes and machines Rick Parrish
- Re: XPCOM across processes and machines Topics Man
- Re: XPCOM across processes and machines Topics Man
- Re: XPCOM across processes and machines Rick Parrish
- Re: XPCOM across processes and machines Topics Man
- Re: XPCOM across processes and machines Topics Man
- Re: XPCOM across processes and machines Topics Man
- Re: XPCOM across processes and machines pete collins
- Re: XPCOM across processes and machines Rick Parrish
- Re: XPCOM across processes and machines Topics Man
- Re: XPCOM across processes and machines Topics Man
- Re: XPCOM across processes and machines Rick Parrish
